Difference between Maven and Ant
1. Maven :
Maven is a powerful project management tool based on the Project Object Model. It helps in managing project builds, documentation, dependency, releases, etc.
2. Ant :
Ant is a command-line toolbox without any coding conventions or project structures, making it flexible and more manageable to use. It is most commonly used to build Java applications.
Differences between Maven and Ant :
Maven | Ant | |
---|---|---|
Definition | It is a framework based on the concept of POM. | It is a Java library and command-line toolbox. |
Convention | It has built-in conventions to place source code, compiled code, etc. | It does not have any formal conventions. |
Project structure Info | It does not require information about the project structure to be provided in the pom.xml file. | It requires information on the project structure to be provided in the build.xml file. |
Lifecycle | It has a lifecycle. | It does not have a lifecycle. |
Nature | It is declarative in nature (only source should be present in the default directory). | It is procedural in nature (manually tell exactly what to do and when to do it). |
Type | It is primarily a project management tool. | It is primarily a project management tool. |
Dependency | It can self download the dependencies from a central repository for building projects. | It has no built-in support for dependency management. |
Reusability | It consists of reusable plugins. | It consists of scripts that are not reusable. |
Preference | It is less preferred. | It is more preferred. |
Complexity | It is more complex. | It is simple and reliable. |
Flexibility | It is less flexible and maintainable. | It is more flexible and maintainable. |
Reports | It creates reports. | It does not create reports. |
Interface | It provides common interface. | It does not provide common interface. |
Naming Conventions | It has standard naming conventions. | It does not have standard naming conventions. |
Popularity | It is more popular in users. | It is less popular in users. |
Scripts | Scripts are not complicated. | Scripts are complicated. |
Ease of Use | It is easy to use for developers. | It is complex to use at first for developers. |
Documentation | It has more documentation. | It has less documentation. |
Reliability | It is not reliable. | It is more reliable than Maven. |
Conflicts | Conflicts are not handled for the same library. | Conflicts are handled for the same library. |
Please Login to comment...